Diaform vs Maze: AI-led conversations or unmoderated tests?

Maze is unmoderated usability testing with quantitative metrics. Diaform is AI-led qualitative conversations. They sit in different categories, and most teams need both.

14-day free trial · No demo required

Side by side

Feature-by-feature comparison

logo
Diaform
Maze

Research method

DIAFORM

AI-led qualitative conversations. The AI listens, follows up, and synthesizes, answering the why behind user behavior.

MAZE

Unmoderated task-based testing. Respondents complete tasks on a prototype or live page; metrics get captured automatically.

Live moderation

DIAFORM

Adaptive AI follow-ups (1, 3, or 5 deep) per answer, the closest thing to a moderator without putting one in the room.

MAZE

Unmoderated by design. No follow-ups; respondents complete the test without anyone (human or AI) intervening live.

Voice answers

DIAFORM

Whisper voice input plus a natural ElevenLabs AI voice. Voice answers are typically 2-3× longer than typed responses.

MAZE

Text-based responses on survey blocks. No conversational voice capture in the moderated-conversation sense.

Open-ended depth

DIAFORM

Per-response summaries, sentiment, answer confidence, and optional notable quotes for qualitative review.

MAZE

Open-text survey blocks exist, but there's no AI follow-up or built-in synthesis for qualitative answers.

Click / heatmap metrics

DIAFORM

Diaform captures conversation, not clicks, no heatmaps, misclick maps, or interaction analytics on a prototype.

MAZE

Misclick heatmaps, click paths, and visual analytics on prototype screens, purpose-built signal for usability decisions.

Prototype testing

DIAFORM

Diaform doesn't host or test prototypes. Use Maze for the prototype task, then chain a follow-up conversation here.

MAZE

Native Figma, Adobe XD, Sketch, and InVision prototype testing, first-class workflow for design validation pre-launch.

Task-completion metrics

DIAFORM

No success-rate or time-on-task metrics, it's a conversation tool, not a usability instrument.

MAZE

Success rate, time on task, mission paths, and direct/indirect success metrics, the quant backbone of unmoderated testing.

Synthesis

DIAFORM

Per-conversation summaries, sentiment, answer confidence, and optional notable quotes generated alongside the transcript.

MAZE

Reports aggregate quantitative results well; qualitative themes still require a researcher to read and code.

Pricing

DIAFORM

14-day trial. Starter $49/mo ($40/mo annual), Standard $89/mo ($74/mo annual), Pro $199/mo ($165/mo annual), and Business $499/mo ($415/mo annual). Enterprise is custom.

MAZE

Free plan with limits, Team ~$99/mo, Organization ~$208/mo (annual). Enterprise tier above that.

Best for

DIAFORM

Churn conversations, onboarding feedback, concept tests, JTBD, the qualitative why behind a behavior or metric.

MAZE

Pre-launch prototype validation, message tests, click tests, quantitative usability signal at scale.

Where Maze stops short

01

No conversational depth

Maze is task-based. Surveys are static. There's no AI follow-up when an answer hints at something interesting.

02

Quant signals, qual gaps

Click data tells you where users got stuck. It rarely tells you why, which is the answer you need before you change anything.

03

Limited for non-prototype research

Churn conversations, onboarding feedback, jobs-to-be-done, outside Maze's task-test wheelhouse.

Where Diaform fills the gap

01

AI follow-ups for the why

Adaptive probing (1, 3, or 5 deep) on every answer, turns vague responses into specific insight.

02

Voice or text

Voice answers are 2-3× longer. Whisper input + ElevenLabs voice make it feel like a real conversation.

03

Sentiment and answer confidence

Per-conversation summaries, sentiment, answer confidence, and optional notable quotes alongside the transcript.

04

Triggered actions in flow

13 topic + 5 sentiment triggers, alert Slack on a churn risk, capture an email, offer a discount mid-conversation.

05

Knowledge base per project

Upload product context (up to 50k tokens) so the AI can ask grounded questions about your roadmap, pricing, or features.

06

30+ languages

Run conversations in respondents' native languages, summaries back in English.

Pick the right tool for the job

01

When Maze is the better fit

Maze is the right pick for prototype testing, click tests, and message tests, anywhere you need a success rate or a heatmap on a defined task. It also fits pre-launch usability checks where you need quantitative validation across a large sample quickly.

02

When Diaform is the better fit

Diaform is built for open-ended qualitative work: churn, onboarding feedback, concept tests, and jobs-to-be-done conversations. Use it when you need contextual follow-ups plus summaries, sentiment, answer confidence, optional notable quotes, and a transcript.

Frequently asked questions.

The practical details behind setting up, running, and scaling this kind of research with Diaform.

Mostly complementary. Maze owns unmoderated usability and prototype testing; Diaform owns AI-led qualitative conversations. Many teams run both.

Your customers have more to say.

Get an AI feedback agent that listens, follows up, and turns every conversation into answers your team can act on.

Launch your first AI feedback agent in minutes.