The score has no content
A 3-out-of-5 could mean slow support, a broken feature, or a bad price change. Score-only software treats all three identically, as the number 3.
A CSAT number tells you something changed. It never tells you what, or what to do about it. Diaform follows every rating with a real conversation, so satisfaction data arrives with the reason attached, not as a chart you argue about in retros.
14-day free trial · No demo required
A 3-out-of-5 could mean slow support, a broken feature, or a bad price change. Score-only software treats all three identically, as the number 3.
Optional comment fields convert in single digits, skew toward the angriest customers, and produce one-liners that still need a human to interpret.
When the trend dips, teams theorize in meetings. The evidence that would settle it, hundreds of customers explaining their score, was never collected.
Ask your CSAT question exactly as you always have. The AI then opens a short conversation about the reason, tailored to the score and the answer given.
"Support was slow" gets a different follow-up than "the app crashed". The AI chases each thread the way an analyst would, at every volume.
A resigned 4 and an enthusiastic 4 are different customers. Sentiment on every transcript separates them, which the number alone never will.
Customers explaining satisfaction out loud give 2-3× more detail than typed comments, and can switch to text whenever they prefer.
A low score from a key account pings Slack immediately, with the summarized reason attached, while an apology can still land.
Analytics aggregate sentiment and themes across responses, so "CSAT dropped 0.3" comes with "driven by the checkout change" in the same view.
Keep your existing CSAT scale for continuity. Add your business context so the AI's follow-ups are informed and on-topic.
After support interactions, purchases, renewals, or periodically. One link works in any email flow, product surface, or QR code.
The AI asks why, probes the specifics, and closes politely, typically 2-4 minutes, by voice or text, in 30+ languages.
Summaries and sentiment per response, driver themes in aggregate, Slack alerts on red flags, CSV export for deeper cuts.
Learn whether the low score was the agent, the policy, or the product, three very different fixes that one number conflates.
Capture the full first impression while it's fresh: what almost stopped them, what surprised them, what they'd warn a friend about.
Before the renewal conversation, know what the account actually thinks, from the account, not from the CSM's optimism.
Quarterly satisfaction pulses where every score arrives with its reasoning, so the QBR deck writes itself from evidence.
Measure satisfaction with a specific flow after using it, and hear which step dragged the score down.
For services and e-commerce: satisfaction with delivery, staff, or the visit, with the story behind every outlier rating.
The practical details behind setting up, running, and scaling this kind of research with Diaform.
Software for measuring how satisfied customers are, typically via CSAT ratings after key interactions. Traditional tools focus on collecting and dashboarding the score; Diaform adds the layer that usually stays missing, a conversation with each customer about what drove their rating.
Explore the other ways Diaform can turn a static request for feedback into a useful conversation.
Get an AI feedback agent that listens, follows up, and turns every conversation into answers your team can act on.
Launch your first AI feedback agent in minutes.